Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2390 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4890 mm
4760 mm
1920 mm
1930 mm
1695 mm
1927 mm
2850 mm
2750 mm
350 L
400 L
160 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
13.4 km/L
10 Km/L
67L
75 L
12 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
F Sport Steering Wheel
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
F Sport Leather Seats with Ventilation (Fr & Rr)
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
8 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L
246 BHP - 366 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & 8 Speed Automatic Transmission & AT & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
Automatic
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Triple Beam LED Headlamps
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.4
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
16-valve DOHC, Chain Drive
/
None
Single Turbo
4
4
275 BHP
224 BHP
420 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L
- Steering Adjustment
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L has a wheelbase of 2850 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Lexus RX350 F Sport 2.4L uses Front Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.