CarteaCompare Cars3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 vs Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT

3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 vs Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

6

Dimensions

3

3

2021kg

2295

16

16

6193

5915

2283

2280

3682

3860

4.5T

3400

166

/

/

1950

/

6.4m

/

3180 - 1760 – 1605

/

9.3m³

/

1105

Fuel Economy

100

70

/

9.1 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

Driver Seat

/

/

/

4.2

/

/

/

/

Safety

Side Driver Airbag.Driver & Passenger Airbags.

Driver & Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

8

/

/

/

2

Transmission

/

6-Speed Manual Transmission

6-Speed Manual Transmission

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Drive

/

Macpherson Strut

/

Leaf spring rigid

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

215/70R16C

/

215/70R16C

Key Spec

2.3 L - 2.3 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

125 - 125

88 BHP - 277

6-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Diesel

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 - 3

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.3

3.5

Diesel

Gasoline

125

277

/

351

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Limiter
    • Spare Wheel
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHiace Van High Roof GAS MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 if you care more about power; choose Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2018 2.7L Commuter GLX High Roof LWB

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

VS

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L GLS high roof (3 seater)

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Partner 2024 e-Partner (Long)

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van STD DSL AT

Renault | 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1

VS

Toyota | Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 has a wheelbase of 3682, while Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT has a wheelbase of 3860. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 uses Rear Drive, while Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT uses Rear Drive.