300 3.6L S vs Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
233 km/h
/
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5044 mm
4720 mm
1902 mm
2089 mm
1492 mm
1441 mm
3053 mm
2875 mm
462 L
682 L
/
4 Doors
/
138 m
Fuel Economy
9.8 Km/L
/
72 L
/
9.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
17
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
0.0 L
292 BHP - 472 BHP
261 BHP - 513 BHP
Automatic
AT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Electric
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
305 BHP
441 BHP
358 Nm
493 Nm
Motor
/
9.4
/
options.Lithium-Ion
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 3.6L S
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 3.6L S if you care more about price; choose Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 3.6L S has a fuel consumption of 10.2, while Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 3.6L S has a wheelbase of 3053 mm, while Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive has a wheelbase of 2875 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 3.6L S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 3.6L S uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Model 3 Long Range All-Wheel Drive uses All Wheel Drive.