300 Challenger 2.0T vs Captiva LS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
1051L
224 m
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
2 Front and sides
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
9
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Mcpherson
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 3.0 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
144 BHP - 264 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
HALOGEN
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
144 BHP
387 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Captiva LS
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.