300 Challenger 2.0T vs Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
195
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4687
1930 mm
1848
1927 mm
1487
2750 mm
2787
400 L
/
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10.9
75 L
60
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
143 BHP - 215
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
215 BHP
387 Nm
300
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Cool box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT has a fuel consumption of 9.17. Therefore, Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT has a wheelbase of 2787. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT uses Front Wheel Drive.