300 Challenger 2.0T vs HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4785
1930 mm
1905
1927 mm
1700
2750 mm
2870
400 L
/
224 m
/
/
255/45 R20
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
13.3
75 L
64
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/45 R20
/
255/45 R20
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
252 BHP
387 Nm
380
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD has a wheelbase of 2870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while HS5 Deluxe Pro 4WD uses Four-Wheel Drive.