300 Challenger 2.0T vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD Comparison

Car Information

/

9.3

/

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

180

4

4

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4760 mm

4.547

1930 mm

1.805

1927 mm

1.685

2750 mm

2.670

400 L

657

224 m

/

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

14.3

75 L

63

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L

223 BHP - 342 BHP

147 BHP - 148 HP

Automatic

8 speed CVT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1499 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Single Turbo

/

4

/

224 BHP

147 BHP

387 Nm

250

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Smart

Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

VS

Exeed | VX Luxury

Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

VS

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L Adventure

Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT

Tank | 300 Challenger 2.0T

VS

Audi | Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD has a wheelbase of 2.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2024 1.5T Infinity S-AWD uses All Wheel Drive.