300 Challenger 2.0T vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4709 mm
1930 mm
1897 mm
1927 mm
1745 mm
2750 mm
2705 mm
400 L
331 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.4 L - 3.0 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
165 BHP - 236 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
181 BHP
387 Nm
245 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.