300 Challenger 2.0T vs Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
240 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3492 cc
Chinese
Japanese
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
5350 mm
1930 mm
2030 mm
1927 mm
1955 mm
2750 mm
3075 mm
400 L
836 L
224 m
253 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
97 L
10 Km/L
7.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
14.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
223 BHP - 342 BHP
275 BHP - 495 BHP
Automatic
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
425 BHP
387 Nm
700 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L has a wheelbase of 3075 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Patrol LE Titanium+ 3.5L uses Four Wheel Drive .