300 Challenger 2.0T vs RAV4 ADV 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4615
1930 mm
1865
1927 mm
1705
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.4
75 L
55
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Sporty leather
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19(Spare Tire Size 165/90 D18)
/
235/55 R19(Spare Tire Size 165/90 D18)
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
170 - 219
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
204
387 Nm
243
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAV4 ADV 4X4
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose RAV4 ADV 4X4 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while RAV4 ADV 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, RAV4 ADV 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while RAV4 ADV 4X4 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while RAV4 ADV 4X4 uses Four-Wheel Drive.