300 Challenger 2.0T vs T Roc R-Line Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4251
1930 mm
1819
1927 mm
1594
2750 mm
2603
400 L
445
224 m
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
15.8
75 L
50
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For Front And Rear Passengers Incl. Side Airbags In Front.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.4 L - 1.4 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
150 BHP
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.4
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
150 BHP
387 Nm
250
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
T Roc R-Line
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Wheel Bolt With Anti-theft Protection(Unlockable)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price; choose T Roc R-Line if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while T Roc R-Line has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, T Roc R-Line is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while T Roc R-Line has a wheelbase of 2603. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while T Roc R-Line uses Front Wheel Drive.