300 Challenger 2.0T vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5
4760 mm
4323
1930 mm
1809
1927 mm
1653
2750 mm
2585
400 L
359/1166
224 m
145
/
1318
/
17
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
17.2
75 L
45
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Fabric
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
223 BHP - 342 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
118 BHP
387 Nm
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.