300 S 3.6L vs Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
225
6
N/A, Electric
3597 cc
/
American
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
5044 mm
4690
1905 mm
1850
1490 mm
1440
3048 mm
2880
461 L
425
127 m
/
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
9.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
409
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8.4
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
0.0 L
292 BHP - 472 BHP
261 BHP - 513 BHP
Automatic
AT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Electric
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.6 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
4
/
300 BHP
283 BHP
357 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 S 3.6L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 S 3.6L if you care more about interior space; choose Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 S 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 10.31, while Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 S 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3048 mm, while Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 S 3.6L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 S 3.6L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Tesla Model 3 2019 Standard Range Plus uses Rear Wheel Drive.