300 Touring 3.6L vs Seal Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
180 km/h
6
/
3597 cc
/
American
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
5044 mm
4800 mm
1905 mm
1875 mm
1490 mm
1460 mm
3048 mm
2920 mm
461 L
400 L
127 m
145 mm
/
Flush Door
/
2055
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
9.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
8.4
15.6
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
12
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
/
Double wishbone suspension
/
Multi- link（5 links）
Key Spec
3.6 L - 6.4 L
/
292 BHP - 472 BHP
204 BHP - 523 BHP
Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
520 km - 570 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
4
/
300 BHP
308 BHP
357 Nm
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
Motor
/
9h
/
Blade Battery
/
150 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
300 Touring 3.6L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Seal Design
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 300 Touring 3.6L if you care more about price; choose Seal Design if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 300 Touring 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 10.31, while Seal Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 300 Touring 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3048 mm, while Seal Design has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Touring 3.6L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 300 Touring 3.6L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Seal Design uses Rear Drive.