3008 1.6T Active+ vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
222 km/h
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4447 mm
4624 mm
1610 mm
1860 mm
1624 mm
1681 mm
2675 mm
2718 mm
520 L
841 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
9.9 Km/L
53 L
60 L
15.4 Km/L
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1.6 L
2.4 L - 3.2 L
156 BHP - 300 BHP
184 BHP - 272 BHP
Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 6 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
271 BHP
250 Nm
324 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
3008 1.6T Active+
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and distinctive exterior design
- High quality and luxurious interior
- Advanced and convenient driving techniques
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Suspension needs improvement in comfort
- The price is considered relatively high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick3008 1.6T Active+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 3008 1.6T Active+ if you care more about price; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 3008 1.6T Active+ has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, 3008 1.6T Active+ is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 3008 1.6T Active+ has a wheelbase of 2675 mm, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 3008 1.6T Active+ uses Front Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.