408 GT vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

8.2

6.5

158

160+160

300

/

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4687

5209

1848

2010

1486

1731

2787

3110

536

/

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

/

143 BHP - 215

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

215

429 BHP

158

/

5500

/

300

600

2000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick408 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 408 GT if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | TXL Flagship 2.0T

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship (4WD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Dodge | Durango 3.6L SXT Plus (RWD)

Peugeot | 408 GT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2023 1.6T GT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 408 GT uses No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.