6 Pure vs 1.6 Turbo Hybrid Comparison

Car Information

/

47.7

/

264

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

/

4

/

2488 cc

1,598

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4870 mm

5050

1840 mm

1880

1450 mm

1480

2830 mm

2895

419 L

/

/

1624

/

1631

Fuel Economy

15 Km/L

/

62 L

/

15 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

10

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

6

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension

/

MacPherson Strut / Multi-Link Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2500 L

2.5 L - 3470 L

180 BHP - 231 BHP

177 - 300 BHP

Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle

8 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.5 L

1.6

Gasoline

Hybrid

Single Turbo

/

4

/

185 BHP

177

250 Nm

264

/

47.7

/

177

/

4500

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

47.7 kW

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 6 Pure

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • 1.6 Turbo Hybrid

    • Power Tailgate
    • Welcome Light
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick1.6 Turbo Hybrid

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 6 Pure if you care more about power; choose 1.6 Turbo Hybrid if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Mazda | 6 Pure

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Honda | Ciciv LX

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Toyota | Corolla 2.0L XLI Executive

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

BYD | Qin Plus FWD

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2022 Super Plus

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 6 Pure has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 6 Pure has a wheelbase of 2830 mm, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2895. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 1.6 Turbo Hybrid, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 6 Pure uses Front Wheel Drive, while 1.6 Turbo Hybrid uses No data.