6 Pure vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
185
4
/
2488 cc
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
4
4870 mm
4765
1840 mm
1837
1450 mm
1495
2830 mm
2720
419 L
500
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
17
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
26
62 L
48
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Sensatec Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
9
10.1-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L
151 BHP - 231 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
185 BHP
197 BHP
250 Nm
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Comparison of configuration highlights
6 Pure
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 6 Pure if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 6 Pure has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 6 Pure has a wheelbase of 2830 mm, while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 6 Pure, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 6 Pure uses Front Wheel Drive, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.