6 Pure vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

210

4

6

2488 cc

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4870 mm

5040

1840 mm

1905

1450 mm

1479

2830 mm

3052

419 L

455

Fuel Economy

15 Km/L

9.3

62 L

70

15 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.5 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

151 BHP - 231 BHP

292 BHP - 797 BHP

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.5 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

185 BHP

300 BHP

250 Nm

358

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 6 Pure

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Stylish and modern exterior design
  • High internal manufacturing quality
  • Great driving and control fun

Negative

  • The back space may be tight
  • The suspension system can be harsh on off road
  • The interface of some technologies needs improvements

Positive

  • Amazing power and acceleration
  • Unique American muscular design
  • Pleasant driving experience and excellent control

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The quality of interior materials is average
  • Suspension comfort is not ideal

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick6 Pure

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 6 Pure if you care more about price; choose Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 508 2019 1.6T Active

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Dongfeng | Mage E1

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

GAC | GAC Empow 1.5T GE

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

GAC | EMPOW GE

Mazda | 6 Pure

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Malibu 2020 1.5L Turbo LT

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 6 Pure has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, 6 Pure is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 6 Pure has a wheelbase of 2830 mm, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 3052. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 6 Pure uses Front Wheel Drive, while Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.