6 Pure vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
190
4
4
2488 cc
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4870 mm
4650
1840 mm
1905
1450 mm
1630
2830 mm
2775
419 L
/
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
15.8
62 L
51
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
13.2
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5
151 BHP - 231 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic & SKYACTIV® 6-speed Automatic Transaxle
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
185 BHP
202 BHP
250 Nm
305
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
6 Pure
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick6 Pure
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose 6 Pure if you care more about price; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, 6 Pure has a fuel consumption of 6.67, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, 6 Pure has a wheelbase of 2830 mm, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 6 Pure, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 6 Pure uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.