CarteaCompare CarsX55 LV2 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

X55 LV2 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) Comparison

Car Information

/

11.3

/

Engine / Motor

/

193

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1550

/

4620

4.355

1886

1.810

1680

1.625

2735

2.670

1970

/

350

358

160

/

/

Fuel Economy

53

63

/

12.5

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Dual Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver And Passenger

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

/

/

/

/

4

/

/

Transmission

7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission

Automatic

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Macpherson Independent Suspension

/

Multi-Link Independent Suspension

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

138 - 185 BHP

150 - 150

7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission & 7DCT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

A156T2H

/

305

197

/

150 BHP

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X55 LV2

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Seatbelt pretensioner
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX55 LV2

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X55 LV2 if you care more about price; choose Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | X55 LV2

VS

Haval | Haval H2 2018 1.5L Dignity

BAIC | X55 LV2

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 S

BAIC | X55 LV2

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2020 2.0L PE (4x4)

BAIC | X55 LV2

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2019 2.0L PE (4x4)

BAIC | X55 LV2

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X55 LV2 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X55 LV2 has a wheelbase of 2735, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X55 LV2, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X55 LV2 uses Front Drive, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.