CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs C5 TECH 1.5L

900 2.0T Ultra vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

Engine / Motor

240

180 km/h

4

4

/

1496 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

6

5

5240

4400 mm

1999

1830 mm

1810

1590 mm

3160

2630 mm

/

5

Fuel Economy

/

7.1

/

51 L

/

6.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

10.25

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

156 - 197

DHT

7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

6

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

194 BHP

1038

290

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • C5 TECH 1.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick900 2.0T Ultra

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.