CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic

900 2.0T Ultra vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

Engine / Motor

240

185 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4440 mm

1999

1833 mm

1810

1560 mm

3160

2700 mm

/

330 L

Fuel Economy

/

13.5 Km/L

/

60 L

/

13.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

530 BHP - 540 BHP

/

DHT

/

Gasoline

/

TBD

/

6

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.8 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

130 BHP

1038

170 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • GS Sport 1.8L Classic

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.