900 2.0T Ultra vs CS35 Plus Trend Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

Engine / Motor

240

/

4

/

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4335

1999

1825

1810

1660

3160

2600

/

17

/

4

Fuel Economy

/

17.3

/

53

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Mocha Leather

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Airbag (Driver & Passenger)

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

10.25 Inch

/

/

/

6

Transmission

DHT

DCT

/

DCT

/

7

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

/

Electric

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

215/55 R17

275/45 R21

215/55 R17

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.4 L - 1.4 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

156 BHP - 158 BHP

DHT

DCT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

6

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.4 T

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

158 BHP

1038

260

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • CS35 Plus Trend

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick900 2.0T Ultra

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price; choose CS35 Plus Trend if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS35 Plus Trend has a fuel consumption of 5.78. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while CS35 Plus Trend has a wheelbase of 2600. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while CS35 Plus Trend uses Front Drive.