CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

900 2.0T Ultra vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

Engine / Motor

240

161 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4341 mm

1999

1804 mm

1810

1693 mm

3160

2676 mm

/

16

/

414 L

Fuel Economy

/

17.2 Km/L

/

50 L

/

17.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

105 BHP - 135 BHP

DHT

Automatic & CVT & Manual

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

115 BHP

1038

156 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick900 2.0T Ultra

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.