900 2.0T Ultra vs MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) Comparison

Car Information

4.6

7.9

Engine / Motor

240

161

4

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4287

1999

1836

1810

1504

3160

2705

/

363

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

/

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

530 BHP - 540 BHP

168 BHP - 245

DHT

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

6

5 - 5

/

TBD

/

400Km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

540 BHP

168 BHP

1038

250

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD)

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Rollover stability control
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about interior space; choose MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2023 1.6L PE (4x2)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2024 1.6L PE (4x2)

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Honda | Honda HRV 2019 1.8 i-VTEC LX

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Chery | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) has a wheelbase of 2705. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while MG 4 EV 2024 51 kWh COM (RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.