900 2.0T Ultra vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

Engine / Motor

240

200 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

6

7 Seater

5240

4709 mm

1999

1897 mm

1810

1745 mm

3160

2705 mm

/

331 L

Fuel Economy

/

14.7 Km/L

/

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.4 L - 3.0 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

165 BHP - 236 BHP

DHT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

6

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

181 BHP

1038

245 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick900 2.0T Ultra

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about price; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

JAC | JAC S3 2024 1.6L Intelligent

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

Renault | All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT

Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

VS

JAC | JAC S3 2023 1.6L Intelligent

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 900 2.0T Ultra, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.