CarteaCompare Cars900 2.0T Ultra vs X55 LV2

900 2.0T Ultra vs X55 LV2 Comparison

Car Information

4.6

/

/

142

Engine / Motor

240

/

4

/

Dimensions

6

5 Seater

5240

4325

1999

1830

1810

1640

3160

/

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

275/45 R21

/

275/45 R21

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

530 BHP - 540 BHP

138 - 185 BHP

DHT

7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission & 7DCT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

6

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

540 BHP

149 BHP

1038

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • 900 2.0T Ultra

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • X55 LV2

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickX55 LV2

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose 900 2.0T Ultra if you care more about power; choose X55 LV2 if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

    VS

    Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

    Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

    Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

    VS

    Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    Lynk & Co | 900 2.0T Ultra

    VS

    Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, 900 2.0T Ultra has a fuel consumption of No data, while X55 LV2 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, 900 2.0T Ultra has a wheelbase of 3160, while X55 LV2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. 900 2.0T Ultra uses All Wheel Drive, while X55 LV2 uses No data.