ALTIMA S 2.5L vs Camry LE 2.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1440
/
16
17
4
/
4900
4920
1852
1840
2825
/
/
1445
Fuel Economy
16.4
17.2
61
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
5
7
✓
/
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
Rear Power
Safety
Dual Front Airbags
Driver, Front Passenger, Side And Curtain.
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
CVTS
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Independent Strut Front Suspension
/
Multi-link Independent Rear Suspension
/
Wheels/brakes
Vented Disc
/
Disc
/
/
215/55R17
/
215/55R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
179 BHP - 270 BHP
176 BHP - 298 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & CVT
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DOHC
/
4
/
188 BHP
201 BHP
188hp @ 6000 rpm
/
244
240
244 Nm torque @ 3600 rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ALTIMA S 2.5L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Camry LE 2.5L
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ALTIMA S 2.5L if you care more about price; choose Camry LE 2.5L if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 6.1, while Camry LE 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Camry LE 2.5L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ALTIMA S 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2825, while Camry LE 2.5L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ALTIMA S 2.5L uses Front Drive, while Camry LE 2.5L uses No data.