Ambition vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
185 km/h
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
16"
/
4225
4949 mm
1975
1930 mm
1612
1790 mm
2651
2810 mm
1531
/
1516
/
Fuel Economy
16.8
10.5 Km/L
/
74 L
/
10.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
ESC
/
ABS
✓
TCS/ASR
/
ESC
/
Infotainment
8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Electronic Differential Locking System
/
Automatic 6-speed
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
115 hp
233 - 233
Automatic 6-speed
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.0 TSI
/
115 hp
233 BHP
115/5,000-5,500
/
175
360 Nm
178/1,750–4,500
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ambition
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Rollover stability control
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAmbition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ambition if you care more about price; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ambition has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, Ambition is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ambition has a wheelbase of 2651, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ambition uses Front Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.