CarteaCompare CarsAmbition vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Ambition vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

11.9

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

186

190

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

16"

/

4225

4.275

1975

1.765

1612

1.535

2651

2.570

1531

/

1516

/

/

240

Fuel Economy

16.8

15.4

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

ESC

/

ABS

TCS/ASR

ESC

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8"

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Electronic Differential Locking System

/

Automatic 6-speed

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

115 hp

145 BHP - 148 BHP

Automatic 6-speed

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Turbocharge

/

1.0 TSI

/

115 hp

148 BHP

115/5,000-5,500

/

175

192

178/1,750–4,500

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

N/A

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ambition

    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Rollover stability control
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAmbition

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ambition if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Skoda | Ambition

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

Skoda | Ambition

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

Skoda | Ambition

VS

Dongfeng | AX7 E1

Skoda | Ambition

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

Skoda | Ambition

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ambition has a fuel consumption of 5.95, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Ambition is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ambition has a wheelbase of 2651, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ambition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ambition uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.