CarteaCompare CarsAT4 ULTIMATE vs Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth

AT4 ULTIMATE vs Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

190 km/h

Dimensions

7

8 Seater

20"

/

/

5 Doors

/

5636 mm

/

2029 mm

/

1941 mm

/

3343 mm

/

592 L

Fuel Economy

/

8.1 Km/L

/

107 L

/

8.1 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front and Back Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Driver Seat

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

14

/

BOSE

/

Transmission

MECHANICAL

/

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC

/

Chassis & Steering

MAGNETIC RIDE CONTROL SUSPENSION

/

AIR RIDE ADAPTIVE SUSPENSION

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

5.3 L - 6.2 L

3.5 L - 5.4 L

320 BHP - 420 BHP

300 BHP - 440

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC & Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 9 Seater

6 Seater - 8

Exterior

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

HIGH APPROACH ANGLE BUMPER

/

/

Engine

V

/

6.2L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

ECOTEC3 V8

/

420 HP

400 BHP

624 NM

650 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • AT4 ULTIMATE

    • Power Tailgate
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing capabilities
  • Advanced entertainment systems

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Their price is relatively high
  • Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAT4 ULTIMATE

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose AT4 ULTIMATE if you care more about price; choose Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

GMC | AT4 ULTIMATE

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve 5.7L

GMC | AT4 ULTIMATE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2018 5.6L LE Platinum City

GMC | AT4 ULTIMATE

VS

Chevrolet | Traverse 3.6L Premium (FWD)

GMC | AT4 ULTIMATE

VS

Ford | Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth

GMC | AT4 ULTIMATE

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2023 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, AT4 ULTIMATE has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth has a fuel consumption of 12.35. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, AT4 ULTIMATE has a wheelbase of No data, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth has a wheelbase of 3343 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AT4 ULTIMATE uses No data, while Expedition 3.5L EcoBoost Stealth uses All Wheel Drive.