Avatr 11 2024 AWD vs 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
4.5
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
200
240 km/h
N/A, Electric
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.880
4447 mm
1.970
1841 mm
1.601
1624 mm
2.975
2675 mm
489
520 L
Fuel Economy
/
58.8 Km/L
/
43 L
/
58.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
680
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
570 BHP - 599 BHP
156 BHP - 300 BHP
TBD
Automatic & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
650 km
/
5 Seater
5 - 6 Seater
/
1.6 L - 1.6 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
0.0 L
1.6 L
Electric
Hybrid
570 BHP
300 BHP
650
520 Nm
Motor
Double
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Avatr 11 2024 AWD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)
- 360 Degree camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and distinctive exterior design
- High quality and luxurious interior
- Advanced and convenient driving techniques
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Suspension needs improvement in comfort
- The price is considered relatively high
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAvatr 11 2024 AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Avatr 11 2024 AWD if you care more about price; choose 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 1.7. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Avatr 11 2024 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.975, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2675 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Avatr 11 2024 AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.