AX7 E1 vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
4
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1600
/
5 Doors
/
4660
4.275
1880
1.765
1690
1.535
2715
2.570
565 L
240
190 mm
/
Fuel Economy
15.1
15.4
60 L
48
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
4
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Double Wishbone Independent Suspension
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
225/60 R18
/
225/60 R18
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5
2.0 L - 2000 L
188 BHP
147 BHP - 148 BHP
AT
Automatic
Gasoline
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
4
/
188 BHP
148 BHP
300 Nm
192
Technologies
✓
✓
ECO/ SPORT
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
AX7 E1
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose AX7 E1 if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, AX7 E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.62, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, AX7 E1 has a wheelbase of 2715, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AX7 E1, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AX7 E1 uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.