CarteaCompare CarsBAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

BAW MNI BUS vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) Comparison

Engine / Motor

/

160

/

4

Dimensions

/

13 Seater

/

5380

/

1880

/

2285

/

3110

/

9800

Fuel Economy

/

9.5

/

70

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Manual

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

TBD

2.5 L - 3.5 L

TBD

88 BHP - 277

TBD

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

TBD

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

2.7 L

/

Gasoline

/

149 BHP

/

240

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • BAW MNI BUS

    • Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • 360 Degree Camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear AC Controls
      • Temperature Display
      • Welcome Light
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Collision Detection
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Spacious and versatile space
    • High durability and reliability
    • Excellent stability and driving quality

    Negative

    • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
    • Fuel economy is lower than expected
    • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickToyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose BAW MNI BUS if you care more about overall equipment; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    BAW | BAW MNI BUS

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter A/T

    BAW | BAW MNI BUS

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.5L Commuter M/T

    BAW | BAW MNI BUS

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)

    BAW | BAW MNI BUS

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van

    BAW | BAW MNI BUS

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Panel Van High Roof LWB

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, BAW MNI BUS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, BAW MNI BUS has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BAW MNI BUS uses No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) uses Rear Wheel Drive.