BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2285
/
20 inch
/
4765
4545 mm
1955
1856 mm
1985
1668 mm
2800
2680 mm
34
/
27
/
85
/
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.7 Km/L
85
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
Transmission
✓
/
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated
/
Ventilated
/
Hand Brake
/
275/50 R20
/
275/50 R20
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.0
1.5 L
206 - 292
165 BHP
8AT & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
206
165 BHP
5500
/
420
265 Nm
1600-4000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Power Tailgate
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 if you care more about interior space; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, GS4 1.5T GB is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 has a wheelbase of 2800, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BJ80 Mount Everest 4×4 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.