BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater) vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4715 mm
4490 mm
1911 mm
1874 mm
1690 mm
1613 mm
2760 mm
2750 mm
545 L
/
Fuel Economy
60 L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
224 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
224 BHP
153 BHP
300 Nm
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater) if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater) has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater) has a wheelbase of 2760 mm, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BX7 2.0T AWD Mid Option (7-Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.