BYD SONG L EV 662KM vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
/
5 Seater
/
4490 mm
/
1874 mm
/
1613 mm
/
2750 mm
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L
/
100 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
EHS
TBD
Electric & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Electric
/
153 BHP
/
340 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
BYD SONG L EV 662KM
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose BYD SONG L EV 662KM if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, BYD SONG L EV 662KM has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, BYD SONG L EV 662KM has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. BYD SONG L EV 662KM uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.