C 300 vs CT5 V 3.0T Comparison

Car Information

5.9

/

Engine / Motor

250

250 km/h

/

6

/

2998 cc

/

American

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4,751 mm

4922 mm

1,820 mm

2039 mm

1,442 mm

1452 mm

2,865 mm

2946 mm

/

336 L

/

102 m

Fuel Economy

6.6-7.0 L/100km

8 Km/L

66 L

64 L

11 Km/L

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

15

Transmission

9-speed automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

3.0 L - 6.2 L

204 BHP - 451 BHP

360 BHP - 668 BHP

9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic

10-speed automatic transmission

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

4 Seater - 5

Engine

2.0T

3.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

255 BHP

360 BHP

400 Nm

550 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • C 300

    • CT5 V 3.0T

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Sensor Rear Tailgate
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickCT5 V 3.0T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose C 300 if you care more about overall equipment; choose CT5 V 3.0T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2022 2.0T GT Hybrid

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2021 2.0T Hybrid

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Lincoln | Continental 3.0T Reserve

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Continental 2019 3.0T Reserve

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, C 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15, while CT5 V 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, CT5 V 3.0T is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, C 300 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm , while CT5 V 3.0T has a wheelbase of 2946 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CT5 V 3.0T, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 300 uses Rear Drive, while CT5 V 3.0T uses Rear Wheel Drive.