CarteaCompare CarsC 300 vs Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS)

C 300 vs Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) Comparison

Car Information

5.9

5.3

/

Engine / Motor

250

250

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4,751 mm

4.954

1,820 mm

1.987

1,442 mm

1.457

2,865 mm

2.960

/

/

540

Fuel Economy

6.6-7.0 L/100km

12.0

66 L

74

11 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9-speed automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 5.0 L

204 BHP - 451 BHP

235 BHP - 550 BHP

9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic

Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 5

Engine

2.0T

3.0 L

Petrol

Petrol

255 BHP

377 BHP

400 Nm

450

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

N/A

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • C 300

    • Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS)

      • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree Camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear AC Controls
      • Push Button Start
      • Temperature Display
      • Keyless Entry
      • Welcome Light
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Acceleration Skid Control
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Speed Limiter
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickC 300

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose C 300 if you care more about price; choose Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS)

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2022 2.0T GT Hybrid

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2021 2.0T Hybrid

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Lincoln | Continental 3.0T Reserve

    Mercedes Benz | C 300

    VS

    Lincoln | Lincoln Continental 2019 3.0T Reserve

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, C 300 has a fuel consumption of 15.15, while Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, C 300 has a wheelbase of 2,865 mm , while Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) has a wheelbase of 2.960. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C 300, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 300 uses Rear Drive, while Jaguar XF 2018 3.0L SC S (380 PS) uses Rear Wheel Drive.