C 63 AMG vs L5 6.0 V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
/
7 Seater
/
5555 mm
/
2018 mm
/
1578 mm
/
3435 mm
Fuel Economy
/
5 Km/L
/
105 L
/
5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
6.0 L
204 BHP - 451 BHP
402 BHP
9-speed Automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
Engine
/
6.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
402 BHP
/
550 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
C 63 AMG
L5 6.0 V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL5 6.0 V12
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose C 63 AMG if you care more about overall equipment; choose L5 6.0 V12 if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, C 63 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data, while L5 6.0 V12 has a fuel consumption of 20. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, C 63 AMG has a wheelbase of No data, while L5 6.0 V12 has a wheelbase of 3435 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. C 63 AMG uses No data, while L5 6.0 V12 uses All Wheel Drive.