CarteaCompare CarsCarnival 3.5L EX AT 12 vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 vs Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

3.5 Liter

/

Dimensions

8

/

18

/

5155

/

1995

/

1740

/

Fuel Economy

72

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

4.2

/

/

/

/

Safety

7

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

8 Speed AT

/

8 Speed AT

/

Chassis & Steering

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

/

Key Spec

3.3 L - 3.5 L

/

245 - 290

/

8 Speed AT & 8 Speed AT w/E-SHIFT (SWB) & Automatic & Automatic

/

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

/

TBD

/

7 - 8

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

/

Gasoline

/

3.5 Liters, 3,470 cc, 6 Cylinders, 24 VALVE, DOHC

/

6

/

268 BHP

/

268 hp / 6,400 rpm

/

33.8 Kg.m (331.5 Nm) /5,000 rpm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comfort - Eco - Sports - Smart

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
  • Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious space and comfort in interior design
  • Advanced and reliable security features
  • Stylish design and high-quality materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • Control and driving are not accurate
  • The user interface for some features is complicated

Positive

  • Spacious space and comfort in interior design
  • Advanced and reliable security features
  • Stylish design and high-quality materials

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • Control and driving are not accurate
  • The user interface for some features is complicated

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCarnival 3.5L EX AT 12

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Honda | Honda Odyssey 2019 3.5L EXL

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Honda | Honda Odyssey 2018 3.5L EXL

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Chrysler | Chrysler Pacifica 2020 3.6L V6 Touring L Plus

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12

VS

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX DLX 13

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data, while Carnival 3.5L EX AT 12 uses No data.