Alsvin Advance vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200
Dimensions
5
5
14"
/
4390
4689
1725
1801
1468
1415
2535
,735
Fuel Economy
/
/
45
47
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
/
/
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
yes
/
yes
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
2
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
Steel with Cover
/
175/65 R14
/
175/65 R14
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
105 BHP - 105 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic & DCT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Black
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
105HP
150
145
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Alsvin Advance
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlsvin Advance
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Alsvin Advance if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Alsvin Advance has a fuel consumption of No data, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Alsvin Advance has a wheelbase of 2535, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alsvin Advance, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Alsvin Advance uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.