Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs E5 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
180 km/h
4
/
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4650
4424
1850
1830
1705
1588
2700
2630
590
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
11.4
/
58
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
/
175 BHP
204 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
175 BHP
204 BHP
230
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
E5 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE5 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose E5 Comfort if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while E5 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while E5 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while E5 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.