Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
180
200 km/h
4
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4650
4780 mm
1850
1885 mm
1705
1730 mm
2700
2800 mm
590
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
11.4
16 Km/L
58
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.8 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
175 BHP
290 BHP
230
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
1.6 L
/
197 BHP - 290 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTXL Comfort 1.6T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, TXL Comfort 1.6T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, TXL Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.