CarteaCompare CarsChangan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs X90 1.5T M/T

Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) vs X90 1.5T M/T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180

200 km/h

4

4

/

1462 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4650

4840 mm

1850

1925 mm

1705

1745 mm

2700

2850 mm

590

510 L

/

5 Doors

/

210 mm

Fuel Economy

11.4

12 Km/L

58

57 L

/

12 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.8 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

175 BHP

145 BHP - 197 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.8 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

175 BHP

197 BHP

230

290 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • X90 1.5T M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChangan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) if you care more about price; choose X90 1.5T M/T if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Changan | Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD)

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while X90 1.5T M/T has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, X90 1.5T M/T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700, while X90 1.5T M/T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 1.5T M/T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS75 2017 Fashion (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while X90 1.5T M/T uses Front Wheel Drive.