Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4949
5209
1930
2010
1790
1731
2810
3110
Fuel Economy
10.5
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
233 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 Seater
6 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
233 BHP
429 BHP
360
600
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.