CarteaCompare CarsChangan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs Mokka 1.2T Ultimate Comparison

Car Information

9.8

/

Engine / Motor

185

200 km/h

4

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4949

4151 mm

1930

1791 mm

1790

1531 mm

2810

2557 mm

/

options.1,372 L

Fuel Economy

10.5

16.9 Km/L

74

44 L

/

16.9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.2 L

233 - 233

130 BHP

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

233 BHP

130 BHP

360

230 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

    • 360 Degree camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChangan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price; choose Mokka 1.2T Ultimate if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Jeep | Cherokee 3.2L Longitude

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L GLI (HEV)

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Opel | Mokka 1.2T Ultimate

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Geely | Geely Geometry C 2024 400 GS

Changan | Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2018 2.0L Luxury (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a fuel consumption of 5.92. Therefore, Mokka 1.2T Ultimate is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate has a wheelbase of 2557 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mokka 1.2T Ultimate uses Front Wheel Drive.