Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs G318 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4949
5010
1930
1985
1790
1895
2810
2880
Fuel Economy
10.5
16.3
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.5
233 - 233
252 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
233 BHP
252 BHP
360
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
G318 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickChangan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price; choose G318 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.