Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD vs G6 RWD Standard Range Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4949
4753
1930
1920
1790
1650
2810
2890
/
2025
/
19
/
5
/
571L (1,374L with rear seats folded)
Fuel Economy
10.5
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Front and Rear
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
14.96
/
✓
/
✓
/
18
Battery/Charging
/
CCS2
/
20min = 10-80% SOC
/
215
/
7.5（5-100%）
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
/
Double Wishbone Independent Suspension
/
Rear Multi-link Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
Ventilated Braking Discs
/
Ventilated Braking Discs
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
233 - 233
280 BHP - 470 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 7
5
/
TBD
/
435 - 570
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
233 BHP
280 BHP
360
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
5
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
440
/
1
/
175
/
LFP
/
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
/
210
/
280
Comparison of configuration highlights
Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
G6 RWD Standard Range
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Remote key types
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price; choose G6 RWD Standard Range if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2890. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G6 RWD Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Changan CS95 2024 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while G6 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.